Descartes and AI: the Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence

 

A person with long hair and a robot
AI-Generated Image


 

Introduction:

The AI age needs its own Descartes, its own Kant, to explain what is being created and what it will mean for humanity. This was written by Henry Kissinger( 1923-2023) in his famous book” The Age of AI and Human Future”. The book was co-authored with Eric Schmidt (former CEO of Google) and Daniel Huttenlocher Dean (MIT).

Rene Descartes, the 17th-century French philosopher, laid the groundwork for modern philosophy and profoundly influenced our understanding of the mind. Fast forward to the 21st century, where artificial intelligence (AI) is pushing the boundaries of what we thought possible. This blog will explore the intersections of Descartes' philosophy and the evolving landscape of artificial intelligence.

 

Descartes' Legacy:

 

Descartes' most famous assertion, "Cogito, ergo sum" (I think, therefore I am), crystallizes the essence of human consciousness. His dualism posited a separation between the mind and the body, suggesting that the mind, or the "res cogitans," is distinct from the material world. This dualistic perspective has deep implications for how we conceptualize the potential of artificial intelligence.

 

Concept of Chiliagon 6th Meditation:

On 25 May 2020, I posted on my Facebook Profile about Chiliagon where,

René Descartes emphasized the use of reason to understand the origin and nature of all things and thus he prioritized reason and the human mind over all things. He uses the chiliagon as an example in his Sixth Meditation to show the difference between pure reason and imagination. He says that, when one thinks of Chiliagon, he "does not imagine a thousand aspects or see them as if they existed". Like when he imagines a triangle. Intellect tries to understand God through arguments, although sometimes it comes close to understanding God through wisdom.

 

Chilliagon
Chiliagon

 

Descartes Example of Clock in 5th Meditation:

 

Descartes centuries ago imagined what would happen if someone could create sophisticated human-shaped machines that resemble our bodies and can move just like us. Descartes writes that just as we see a clock consisting only of ropes and springs can count the hours and measure time more accurately than we can despite all our wisdom.

 

AI and Consciousness:

 

As we witness the remarkable progress of AI and the use of chatGPT, questions arise about the nature of consciousness and whether machines can truly "think" in the way humans do. Descartes' dualism, with its emphasis on the non-material mind, challenges the notion that AI could achieve genuine self-awareness or subjective experience. The debate hinges on whether consciousness is an emergent property of complex information processing, as AI proponents argue, or if it requires a different kind of non-material essence, as Descartes suggested.

 

Functionalism and the Computational Mind:

 

Contrary to Descartes' dualism, contemporary discussions often revolve around functionalism and computational theories of mind. These perspectives propose that the mind is essentially an information processor, and consciousness can arise from sufficiently advanced computations, irrespective of the physical substrate. This challenges Descartes' dualistic framework and opens the door to the possibility of creating machines with cognitive capacities.

 

Ethical Considerations:

 

Descartes' philosophy also sheds light on the ethical implications of artificial intelligence. If we strive to create machines with human-like intelligence, do we need to consider ethical responsibilities akin to those we have toward other conscious beings? Descartes' emphasis on the moral implications of thought and consciousness prompts us to reflect on the ethical considerations in AI development, especially concerning issues like autonomy, accountability, and the potential impact on society.

 

Conclusion:

 

Rene Descartes' philosophical legacy continues to resonate in contemporary debates about artificial intelligence. As we navigate the complexities of creating machines with cognitive abilities, Descartes' dualism challenges us to reconsider the fundamental nature of consciousness and the ethical responsibilities that come with playing the role of creators. The evolving relationship between Descartes' ideas and AI invites us to explore the boundaries of what it means to be "thinking beings (Humans)" in a world gradually designed by intelligent machines.


Post a Comment

10 Comments

Hassan Farid said…
Really informative it is sir
Muhammad Yousaf said…
A topic which wanted to some attention. More creative approach sir 😊 you have. But I will just say The AI point of view is that philosophical theories are useful to AI only if they don't preclude human-level artificial systems and provide a basis for designing systems with beliefs, do reasoning, and plan.
Muhammad Yousaf said…
Moreover, Sir There is a little difference between humans and AI, AI can create novel approaches using existing trends and data but lacks inherent innovation and originality. Human decisions can be subject to subjective factors not based solely on data.
Muhammad Yousaf said…
I m thinking about it,the philosophical position that a computer program that causes a machine to behave exactly like a human being would also give the machine subjective conscious experience and a mind, in exactly the same sense that human beings have minds.As you have clear Intellect tries to understand God through arguments, although sometimes it comes close to understanding God through wisdom.
Nasser said…
Descartes' interests extended to diverse subjects, and one of the most striking subjects he studied was artificial intelligence. At least, the contention that he was considering artificial intelligence theory (in the early seventeenth century) is one of the main subject under discussion these days.
Talib Hussain said…
There are methods (also being used) to make machines which can try to learn from there environment just like humans try, but there are limitations due to limited number of processing units (artificial neurons) in the machines and learning methods, as compared to those in the human brain. However, as the material science moves on, greater number of neurons can be embedded in the machine brains...
amjad said…
Thanks Dear for valuable comments
Quite commendable,You summarised and scripted your own perspective,I envy plagiarism which is in TOP TREND now a days!This is a huge threat for the coming generations.
Mian Aleem said…
Very informative , Excellent 👌🏻
Omar Feroze said…
Artificial Intelligence is acknowledged but the ruling remains there is always a man behind the gun.When we go against the nature, nature takes is course.